<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/category/legal/court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aurangabad civic body may launch property tax recovery drive</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aurangabad-civic-body-may-launch-property-tax-recovery-drive-78753</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aurangabad-civic-body-may-launch-property-tax-recovery-drive-78753#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 12:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home page article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurangabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aurangabad real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian real estate sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property in Aurangabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate in India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AURANGABAD: The civic body, supporting recently appointed municipal commissioner Astik Kumar Pandey is expected to originate an uncompromising tax recovery drive. Anticipating a statement to this conclusion, corporator and others have endeavored an amnesty scheme for tax defaulters. Several citizens also understand that huge defaulters should initial be demanded to clear their dues before the commoners are targeted. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aurangabad-civic-body-may-launch-property-tax-recovery-drive-78753/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC strikes down allotment of Karnataka Housing Board sites</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-strikes-down-allotment-of-karnataka-housing-board-sites-78615</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-strikes-down-allotment-of-karnataka-housing-board-sites-78615#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka Housing Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karnataka housing board projects in bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka Housing Board Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BENGALURU: The high court has burned down as unconstitutional the allocation of houses/sites of the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) under two sections of “persons in public life” engraved within the 10 percent discretionary quota. Beneath category A, 25 percent of the discretional quota sites were placed at the conclusion of KHB, to be administered to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-strikes-down-allotment-of-karnataka-housing-board-sites-78615/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dehradun civic body fines over 10 commercial property owners</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dehradun-civic-body-fines-over-10-commercial-property-owners-78609</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dehradun-civic-body-fines-over-10-commercial-property-owners-78609#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial properties in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dehradun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dehradun civic body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate secor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian real estate sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; DEHRADUN: The Dehradun Municipal Corporation (DMC) has inflicted huge penalties on 15 commercial properties for disrupting the self-assessment procurement while repaying their property tax. A DMC team conveyed a casual investigation to confirm the authenticity of the area square meters sent by 50 leading commercial properties of Dehradun. During the verification procedure, the DMC team found that 15 of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dehradun-civic-body-fines-over-10-commercial-property-owners-78609/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC directs the environment ministry to consider regularization plea of Mumbai&#8217;s Adarsh society</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-directs-the-environment-ministry-to-consider-regularization-plea-of-mumbais-adarsh-society-78593</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-directs-the-environment-ministry-to-consider-regularization-plea-of-mumbais-adarsh-society-78593#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian real estate updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai civic authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Ghaziabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Mumbai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MUMBAI: The Supreme Court has addressed the central environment ministry to acknowledge a regularization statement registered by Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai following the most advanced 2018 announcement that agreements with installations in coastal zone regulation (CRZ) regions. The applications registered by the society against the April 2016 order of annihilation relinquished by the Bombay [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-directs-the-environment-ministry-to-consider-regularization-plea-of-mumbais-adarsh-society-78593/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pune civic body to give discounts on property tax to residences with clean premises</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-civic-body-to-give-discounts-on-property-tax-to-residences-with-clean-premises-78587</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-civic-body-to-give-discounts-on-property-tax-to-residences-with-clean-premises-78587#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>supriya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREDAI Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Civic panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Municipal Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  PUNE: the civic body is intriguing to reward the housing societies and residences holding their propositions clear to get solid waste management to the grassroots level. A Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) the referee announced the tidiest houses and society complexes would get bonuses and other perks like reductions on property tax. He said a board of authorities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-civic-body-to-give-discounts-on-property-tax-to-residences-with-clean-premises-78587/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MHADA Unable To Acquire 11,515 Sq.Ft In Mumbai’s Suraj Apartment</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mhada-unable-to-acquire-11515-sq-ft-in-mumbais-suraj-apartment-78576</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mhada-unable-to-acquire-11515-sq-ft-in-mumbais-suraj-apartment-78576#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2019 12:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prahalad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWA/Owners’ Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mhada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHADA Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHADA Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbais's Surat Apartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=78576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) has lost a nearly 20-year-old battle to acquire 11,515 square feet in Mumbai’s Suraj Apartment. A 38-story pencil-like tall building at Breach Candy, in South Mumbai. MHADA had held up claim to the area on the basis of the extra Floor Space Index (FSI) allegedly used by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mhada-unable-to-acquire-11515-sq-ft-in-mumbais-suraj-apartment-78576/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court bench to hear Sahara case on May 19</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-supreme-court-bench-to-hear-sahara-case-on-may-19-62305</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-supreme-court-bench-to-hear-sahara-case-on-may-19-62305#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 07:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dinesh.k</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench to hear Sahara case on May 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearing of Sahara Group Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Supreme Court bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara new proposal in Supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=62305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new bench, which was constituted by the Supreme Court to hear the Sahara case, is scheduled to begin proceedings in the matter today, May 19. The justices that comprise the new Supreme Court bench for hearing the Sahara case include justices TS Thakur and AK Sikri. The constitution of the new bench was necessitated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-supreme-court-bench-to-hear-sahara-case-on-may-19-62305/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Records submitted by NHAI on HRD official charges</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/records-submitted-by-nhai-on-hrd-official-charges-60513</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/records-submitted-by-nhai-on-hrd-official-charges-60513#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 06:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Administrative Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Information Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources Development Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under secretary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=60513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In pursuance of an earlier order, NHAI recently submitted relevant records before a Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice BD Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul. The court heard the plea of DP Majhi, who is presently working as an under-secretary in Human Resources Development Ministry and asked NHAI to produce relevant files before it to “resolve [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/records-submitted-by-nhai-on-hrd-official-charges-60513/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adarsh scam: CBI files revision plea in Bombay HC to drop Ashok Chavan&#8217;s name from charge sheet</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-scam-cbi-files-revision-plea-in-bombay-hc-to-drop-ashok-chavans-name-from-charge-sheet-58751</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-scam-cbi-files-revision-plea-in-bombay-hc-to-drop-ashok-chavans-name-from-charge-sheet-58751#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adarsh Housing Society scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashok Chavan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Sankaranarayanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Central Bureau of Investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has now moved the Bombay high court for the same relief, Two months after the sessions court threw out its plea to drop charges against former Maharashtra CM Ashok Chavan in the Adarsh housing society scam. There was not much evidence against Chavan though initially while seeking sanction it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-scam-cbi-files-revision-plea-in-bombay-hc-to-drop-ashok-chavans-name-from-charge-sheet-58751/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC issues notice to Centre on Defence land encroachment</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-issues-notice-to-centre-on-defence-land-encroachment-58529</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-issues-notice-to-centre-on-defence-land-encroachment-58529#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adarsh Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adarsh Society land Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence land encroachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu & Kashmir land scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jodhpur land scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land encroachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lohegaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai land scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P Sathasivam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prashant Bhushan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune land scam and Kandivli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC issues notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC issues notice to Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sukna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sukna land scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A notice has been issued to the Centre seeking its answer on a PIL seeking CBI probe into alleged encroachment and exploitation of defence land across the country, by the Supreme Court on Monday. A committee headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam decided to hear the petition as per which mismanagement of defence lands leading [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sc-issues-notice-to-centre-on-defence-land-encroachment-58529/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sahara submits new proposal in SC for refunding Rs 20,000 cr</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sahara-submits-new-proposal-in-sc-for-refunding-rs-20000-cr-58501</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sahara-submits-new-proposal-in-sc-for-refunding-rs-20000-cr-58501#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20000 crores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20000 crores refunding Sahara group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C A Sundaram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J S Khehar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K S Radhakrishnan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ram Jethmalani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara group gives the surety to deposit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara new proposal in SC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahara new proposal in Supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrata Roy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sahara group made fresh proposal before the SC for refunding Rs20, 000 crore to investors to make sure the release of its chief Subrata Roy who has been in jail with company’s 2 directors since 4 March. In the proposal, the Sahara group gives the surety to deposit Rs2,500 crore within three working days [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/sahara-submits-new-proposal-in-sc-for-refunding-rs-20000-cr-58501/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMR turns to HC on UDF charges</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airports Economic Regulatory Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP High Court.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengaluru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHIAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR turns to HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR turns to High court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naveen Rao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[udf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GMR has moved the AP High Court challenging the decision of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) in discontinuing collection of user Development Fee for the next two years. The GHIAL has concluded that the AERA has no jurisdiction to fix the UDF and it was the Central government of India who has power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case pending in HC but NHAI fells huge neem tree at Mankapur</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/case-pending-in-hc-but-nhai-fells-huge-neem-tree-at-mankapur-58508</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/case-pending-in-hc-but-nhai-fells-huge-neem-tree-at-mankapur-58508#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AA Kathane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BR Gavai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case pending in HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CV Bhadang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khaparkheda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koradi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M Chandrashekhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mankapur Chowk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mankapur Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Hospital Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NB Shrikhande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHAI felled a huge neem tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHAI wants to cut down another 32 big neem trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panchnama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SP Kshirsagar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudhir Paliwal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree at Mankapur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree cutting in india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vidarbha Environment Action Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NHAI felled a huge neem tree for road widening near the sports complex on Mankapur Road despite public interest litigation (PIL) pending in the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court. The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) seems to be behaving as if it is above the law. The division bench of Justice BR [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/case-pending-in-hc-but-nhai-fells-huge-neem-tree-at-mankapur-58508/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBI gives clean chit to Digivijay Singh in land allotment case of Indore</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cbi-gives-clean-chit-to-digivijay-singh-in-land-allotment-case-of-indore-57978</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cbi-gives-clean-chit-to-digivijay-singh-in-land-allotment-case-of-indore-57978#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress General Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digvijay Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digvijay Singh gets relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hanging the laws to allot land to Treasure Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Allotment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land allotment case of Indore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasure Island shopping complex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Lok Sabha elections, the Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh gets relief from CBI, as the agency gave clean chit to him in a 2008 case of land allotment in Indore for a mall. The CBI, in the report, says that there were evidences found against Digvijaya. He was accused of changing the laws to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cbi-gives-clean-chit-to-digivijay-singh-in-land-allotment-case-of-indore-57978/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC pulls up Uttarakhand govt on illegal construction</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-pulls-up-uttarakhand-govt-on-illegal-construction-57988</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-pulls-up-uttarakhand-govt-on-illegal-construction-57988#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alok Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dehradun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haridwar Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal construction in Uttarakhand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakshaman Jhula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rishikesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swami Kailashanand Mission Trust building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttarakhand govt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttarakhand high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttarakhand high court on illegal construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Uttarakhand high court, on the illegal construction of the 13th floor of the palatial Swami Kailashanand Mission Trust building near Lakshaman Jhula in Rishikesh, has sought the state government&#8217;s response. The chief secretary has been directed by a single bench of Justice Alok Singh to personally scrutinize the matter and file an affidavit along [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-pulls-up-uttarakhand-govt-on-illegal-construction-57988/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court questions DDA to take call on Kathputli ‘residents’</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-questions-dda-to-take-call-on-kathputli-residents-57814</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-questions-dda-to-take-call-on-kathputli-residents-57814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint against DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Kohli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathputli Colony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathputli residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajiv Bansal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation of the Kathputli Colony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resettlement plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HC clears the path for the relocation of the Kathputli Colony by rejecting the petition against the resettlement plan. Justice Hima Kohli questioned the petitioners who are claiming to be the residents of the Kathputli Colony to go to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for the injustice and told the land-owning agency to take [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-questions-dda-to-take-call-on-kathputli-residents-57814/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court admits PIL on cluster redevelopment</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-admits-pil-on-cluster-redevelopment-57624</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-admits-pil-on-cluster-redevelopment-57624#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court admits PIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dattatray Daund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation study of the scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prithviraj Chavan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban development department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A complaint was filed in the Bombay high court by a Thane resident claiming that two civic bodies had authorized cluster redevelopment in their areas without doing any impact evaluation study of the scheme. On March 19 hearing will be done on the PIL filed by Dattatray Daund. Daund alleged that impact assessment study should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-admits-pil-on-cluster-redevelopment-57624/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adarsh case: FIR against ex-CM sought</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-case-fir-against-ex-cm-sought-57630</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-case-fir-against-ex-cm-sought-57630#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adarsh case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adarsh housing scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR against a former chief minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR against ex-CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K L Gidwani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL of case in Bombay high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praveen Wategaonkar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Corruption Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenue minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special CBI court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday an activist filed an application in the special CBI court investigating on the Adarsh housing scam case seeking the registration of an FIR against a former chief minister who was also a revenue minister. On Thursday hearing will be done on the matter. Praveen Wategaonkar, an activist filed a PIL of case in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/adarsh-case-fir-against-ex-cm-sought-57630/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMR considers appeal against aviation regulator</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-considers-appeal-against-aviation-regulator-57149</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-considers-appeal-against-aviation-regulator-57149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees at the airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR Infrastructure Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR Infrastructure’s airport business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad International Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[udf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) has ordered to scrap the user development fee at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport here.  GMR Hyderabad International Airport is considering challenging the order as this will have a negative impact on the company’s financials, said Siddharth Kapur, CFO, GMR Infrastructure’s airport business. Kapur said on the sidelines of India [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-considers-appeal-against-aviation-regulator-57149/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC defines redevelopment rules for general buildings, surrounded by heritage</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-defines-redevelopment-rules-for-general-buildings-surrounded-by-heritage-56961</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-defines-redevelopment-rules-for-general-buildings-surrounded-by-heritage-56961#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chembur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chembur Citizens' Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage precincts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M S Sanklecha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohit Shah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redevelopment rules for general buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Kadam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venkatesh Dhond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=56961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bombay high court, on Tuesday asked BMC to clarify its view on the redevelopment of common buildings coming under a proposed heritage precinct. Hearing a petition by Chembur Citizens&#8217; Forum, representing approximately 500 buildings opposing their heritage status, was a bench of Chief Justice Mohit Shah and Justice M S Sanklecha. As per the petition, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-defines-redevelopment-rules-for-general-buildings-surrounded-by-heritage-56961/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade watchdog rejects complaints against Ambience</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/trade-watchdog-rejects-complaints-against-ambience-56458</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/trade-watchdog-rejects-complaints-against-ambience-56458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-competitive practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Buyer Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development of housing project Caitriona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haryana government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mili Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moran Plantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parasramka Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=56458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations of anti-competitive practices against realty firm Ambience and the Haryana government on the development of a residential project in the city have been rejected by fair trade watchdog. The Competition Commission of India disposed of all three complaints against Ambience and the government filed by Moran Plantation, Mili Marketing and Parasramka Holdings, in an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/trade-watchdog-rejects-complaints-against-ambience-56458/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCC’s dues of Rs 5,000 cr stuck in litigation</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hccs-dues-of-rs-5000-cr-stuck-in-litigation-56333</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hccs-dues-of-rs-5000-cr-stuck-in-litigation-56333#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annual general meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDR obligations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate debt restructuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCC chairman and managing director Ajit Gulabchand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highway construction projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindustan Construction Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydro-electric sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Highway Authority of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Thermal Power Corporation project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praveen Sood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promoters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ennore Port]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=56333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hindustan Construction Company’s dues of Rs. 5, 000 crore, mainly with various government agencies, continue to be stuck in litigation, although a year has passed. Praveen Sood, group chief financial officer, HCC,told sources ,out of the dues of R5,000 crore, R1,000 crore is being battled out in courts for settlement while the remaining R4,000 crore [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hccs-dues-of-rs-5000-cr-stuck-in-litigation-56333/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Difficult to give flawless property papers’</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/difficult-to-give-flawless-property-papers-56112</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/difficult-to-give-flawless-property-papers-56112#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 04:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticipatory bail petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encumbrance certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immovable property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgaged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Owners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=56112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only if land grab bids and &#8216;double documents&#8217; were enough to trouble the property owners/buyers, the state registration department shocked the Madras high court by saying a controversial statement that it is difficult to issue encumbrance certificates without any fault. An encumbrance certificate (EC) is the basic document which reveals the current status of an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/difficult-to-give-flawless-property-papers-56112/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiranandani files suit in Bombay HC against daughter</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-files-suit-in-bombay-hc-against-daughter-54897</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-files-suit-in-bombay-hc-against-daughter-54897#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiranandani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiranandani daughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiranandani group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiranandani Living Pvt Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement of copyright and trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice S J Kathawala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niranjan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priya Hiranandani Vandrevala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surendra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=54897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading real estate businessman Niranjan Hiranandani of the Hiranandani group has filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain his married daughter Priya Hiranandani Vandrevala from using the name &#8216;Hiranandani&#8217; in her business. The suit has been filed by Niranjan, his brother Surendra and their company Hiranandani Constructions Private Ltd (HCPL). They have sought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-files-suit-in-bombay-hc-against-daughter-54897/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC amends property ownership rights of Hindu widows</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-amends-property-ownership-rights-of-hindu-widows-52089</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-amends-property-ownership-rights-of-hindu-widows-52089#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu Succession Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu widow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu widow property ownership rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindu Women's Rights to Property 1937]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[husband's property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab and Haryana High court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widow rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women right to property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=52089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has stated that, under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, for a Hindu widow to get the complete ownership rights of a property belonging to her husband, she need not have to be in actual physical possession of the property. The judgement was given by a division bench comprising [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-amends-property-ownership-rights-of-hindu-widows-52089/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court restricts RWAs from levying maintenance charges on DDA flats</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-restricts-rwas-from-levying-maintenance-charges-on-dda-flats-50451</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-restricts-rwas-from-levying-maintenance-charges-on-dda-flats-50451#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Ownership Act 1988]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA colony flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond District Apartment complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-storied buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Corporation of Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munirka Enclave RWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=50451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Delhi- A Delhi court has made it clear that residents welfare associations (RWAs) managing affairs in colonies built by Delhi Development Authority have no right to impose maintenance charges from residents of those colonies. The court gave this decision during the judgement of a case, wherein a resident of DDA colony had refused to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-restricts-rwas-from-levying-maintenance-charges-on-dda-flats-50451/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMC new property tax bill challenged</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bmc-new-property-tax-bill-challenged-49794</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bmc-new-property-tax-bill-challenged-49794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borivali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Controlling Revenue Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method of calculating tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new property tax bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ready reckoner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent of properties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=49794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new property tax system proposed by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has been challenged by a PIL in the Bombay High Court recently. The new property tax bill will be applicable from April 1, 2013 but has been caught amidsr many controversies. An activist named Rajendra Thacker has filed the PIL which states that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bmc-new-property-tax-bill-challenged-49794/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai residents not happy with new property tax system</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-residents-not-happy-with-new-property-tax-system-44610</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-residents-not-happy-with-new-property-tax-system-44610#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Locality Management and Networking Action Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital value-based system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chembur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property tax bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=44610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unconvinced with the new way of calculating property tax, citizens in Mumbai are planning to move to Bombay High Court regarding the same. The new method is based on  the capital value-based system. The major concern of the residents lies with the ground realities which affects a property&#8217;s price, are not taken into consideration in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-residents-not-happy-with-new-property-tax-system-44610/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyers want the UP Apartment&#8217;s Act implemented</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-want-the-up-apartments-act-implemented-42129</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-want-the-up-apartments-act-implemented-42129#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>praveen.p</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer's group in Noida Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida Authority and developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida West (Noida Extension)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation of the Act provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association (NEFOMA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects by developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP Apartments Act.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=42129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noida- The Greater Noida West (Noida Extension) home buyers are demanding the Greater Noida Authority and developers for the instant implementation of the UP Apartments Act. A homebuyer&#8217;s group called Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association (NEFOMA) made this demand due to the repeated cancellation of bookings and complaints about the arbitrary changes in projects by developers. In a meeting and a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-want-the-up-apartments-act-implemented-42129/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajasthan HC seeks details of plot owners of Gokul Vatika</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rajasthan-hc-seeks-details-of-plot-owners-of-gokul-vatika-40786</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rajasthan-hc-seeks-details-of-plot-owners-of-gokul-vatika-40786#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Corruption Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying plots in Jaipur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gokul Vatika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaipur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaipur Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajasthan high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=40786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jaipur- The Rajasthan high court has directed the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) to procure all the details of the government officials and their relatives who own plots in Gokul Vatika, the controversial residential development. Gokul Vatika, launched in 2005, is a residential scheme located in JLN Road, Jaipur. It was alleged that instead of allotting plots [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rajasthan-hc-seeks-details-of-plot-owners-of-gokul-vatika-40786/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
