<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; Apartment Owners Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/apartment-owners-association/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court orders Unitech to stop construction over AOA&#8217;s complaint</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-unitech-to-stop-construction-over-aoas-complaint-47242</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-unitech-to-stop-construction-over-aoas-complaint-47242#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mainaki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOA.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF complex in Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real esatate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate developers of india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitech developers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=47242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real estate firm Unitech had to put a halt on their construction work at the site of its luxury project, Nirvana South Close, worth around Rs 250 crore, in Gurgaon following an order from a district court. The court ordered stay on construction work as the apartment owners&#8217; association went to court with regard to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-unitech-to-stop-construction-over-aoas-complaint-47242/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apartments replace older homes: New trend in cities</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartments-replace-older-homes-new-realty-trend-in-city-areas-43461</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartments-replace-older-homes-new-realty-trend-in-city-areas-43461#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand for properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lack of land availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell apartments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=43461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lack of land availability and increasing demand for properties in prime city areas, developers are looking at redevelopment of old houses. It is usually a joint venture development wherein the developer signs an agreement with landowners, wherein the house owner will have the ownership of the plot while the builder develops an apartment complex on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartments-replace-older-homes-new-realty-trend-in-city-areas-43461/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flat owners move to SC in Noida</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/flat-owners-move-to-sc-in-noida-26003</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/flat-owners-move-to-sc-in-noida-26003#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWA/Owners’ Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[master plan of Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association (NEFOMA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petitions filed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=26003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association, NEFOMA, a flat owners&#8217; association in Noida, has decided to move to the Supreme Court to seek redress of their complaints related to the Noida Extension flats row. The Allahabad High Court had directed to stop development work in Greater Noida till the 2021 Master Plan is approved [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/flat-owners-move-to-sc-in-noida-26003/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apartment Owners are bound to pay RWA Fee</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartment-owners-are-bound-to-pay-rwa-fee-4430</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartment-owners-are-bound-to-pay-rwa-fee-4430#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 10:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners are bound to pay RWA Fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWA members]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=4430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the flat owners and occupants will not pay the fee, it will be impossible for the RWA or Apartment Owners Association to carry on with welfare activities and services. The owners or occupants of a flat are bound to pay the membership fee to the Residents Welfare Association (RWA) of the colony to fund [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/apartment-owners-are-bound-to-pay-rwa-fee-4430/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residents of Malleswaram form association</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-malleswaram-form-association-4145</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-malleswaram-form-association-4145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 08:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make use of RTI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malleswaram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malleswaram Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malleswaram Residents' Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planting of saplings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planting Saplings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Malleswaram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=4145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents of Malleswaram have come together to form a body to address the various problems the locality faces. The Malleswaram Residents&#8217; Welfare Association, now a registered association, was inaugurated here on Sunday. Sanskrit scholar and director of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan Mathoor Krishnamurthy appreciated the intent behind the formation of the association. “We must serve the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-malleswaram-form-association-4145/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The High Court Stays GVMC Property Tax Hike</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/the-high-court-stays-gvmc-property-tax-hike-3761</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/the-high-court-stays-gvmc-property-tax-hike-3761#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Visakhapatnam Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GVMC tax hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GVMC Visakhapatnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interim order of the High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kakaninagar Residential Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax hike by the GVMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheelanagar Upkeep Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visakha Apartments Residents’ Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visakhapatnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=3761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court issued interim orders on Monday staying the property tax hike by the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation (GVMC). The High Court division bench comprised of Justice V.V.S. Rao and Justice Ramesh Ranganath issued interim orders on Monday staying the property tax hike by the GVMC and ordered that the hike should not be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/the-high-court-stays-gvmc-property-tax-hike-3761/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RWA cannot be blamed for security lapses</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laxity of a security guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resident of DDA Flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents welfare associations cannot be blamed for security lapses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWA cannot be blamed for security lapses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Delhi district forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=2808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents welfare associations cannot be blamed for security lapses because of carelessness of security guards in a colony The South Delhi district forum said that if a resident receives injury due to the laxity of a security guard then it does not amount to &#8220;deficiency in service&#8221; on the part of the association which receives [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder tried to manhandle the residents</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-tried-to-manhandle-the-residents-2289</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-tried-to-manhandle-the-residents-2289#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knightsbridge Apartment Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahadevapura police station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhandle Apartment Owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhandle the residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitefiled Bangalore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=2289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to residents of Knightsbridge Apartment in Whitefield, Vishwanath Reddy, a co-builder tried to manhandle them at the police station who went to complain against him. Vishwanatha Reddy and his relatives owns 72 of the 308 flats but he behaves as if he owns the entire complex. He does not abide by residents’ association rules. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-tried-to-manhandle-the-residents-2289/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety first for this Diwali</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safety-first-for-this-diwali-1418</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safety-first-for-this-diwali-1418#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bursting crackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracker-free Diwali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diwali safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fireworks Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[‘No Crackers’ campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crackers form an integral part of Diwali celebrations and can’t be done away with.However, no celebration should end in mishaps. The RWA or Apartment owners association must ensure safe and secure diwali celebration in their apartment communities. If you are going to set off fireworks this year, ensure precautions are taken for Fireworks Safety. Besides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safety-first-for-this-diwali-1418/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parking areas cannot be sold as flats or garages: Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/parking-spaces-cannot-be-sold-separately-689</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/parking-spaces-cannot-be-sold-separately-689#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombay high court judgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombay high court judgement information system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[builders cannot sell parking areas as independent units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgement of bombay high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai high court judgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking lot area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking slots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public parking lots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has that ruled builders/promoters cannot sell parking areas in the stilt area as independent units as the same is to be extended as “common areas and facilities“ for the owners. The apex court passed the judgment while dismissing the appeal of the promoter, Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt Ltd, challenging the Bombay High Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/parking-spaces-cannot-be-sold-separately-689/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residents of Bangalore are now Hiring Private Surveyors</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-bangalore-hiring-private-surveyors-111</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-bangalore-hiring-private-surveyors-111#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition of property for road widening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Corner Apartment Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Corner Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Surveyors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road widening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarjapur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarjapur Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarjapur Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveying consultant company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer of Development Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With BBMP not providing complete information in TDR notices they despatch, residents are hiring land surveyors to measure their property for accurate data. In April, residents of Sarjapur Road received a notice from the BBMP, informing them about acquisition of a portion of their property for road widening. The notice says the road is to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-bangalore-hiring-private-surveyors-111/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
