<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; Consumer Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/consumer-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jalandhar flat owners deprived of moving into flats due to lack of basic amenities</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/jalandhar-flat-owners-deprived-of-moving-into-flats-due-to-lack-of-basic-amenities-28879</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/jalandhar-flat-owners-deprived-of-moving-into-flats-due-to-lack-of-basic-amenities-28879#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic amenities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indra Puram colony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jalandhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jalandhar improvement trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lack of basic amenities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential properties in Jalandhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sewerage connections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=28879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Around 900 flat-owners of Indra Puram Colony on the outskirts of Jalandhar are facing a tragical irony as even after paying the last installment before three years, they cannot move into the flats as basic amenities such as electricity, water and sewerage connections are missing. The flat owners paid the full amount to the Jalandhar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/jalandhar-flat-owners-deprived-of-moving-into-flats-due-to-lack-of-basic-amenities-28879/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builders can be dragged to consumer court for construction defect</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-can-be-dragged-to-consumer-court-for-construction-defect-21098</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-can-be-dragged-to-consumer-court-for-construction-defect-21098#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=21098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any buyer of any apartment in India can sue the builder of the apartment for any king of construction defect under the Consumer protection Act. The Supreme Court has said a private developer selling a flat to a consumer can be defined as a service and thus falls under the Act. New flat owners will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-can-be-dragged-to-consumer-court-for-construction-defect-21098/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder in Bangalore is fined for delay in construction</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-in-bangalore-is-fined-for-delay-in-construction-20929</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-in-bangalore-is-fined-for-delay-in-construction-20929#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment in Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dely in Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[possession of apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate in Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SJR builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sjr Luxuria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=20929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has ordered the SJR builder to pay compensation to a petitioner for not handing over an apartment in Bangalore on time. The complainant had booked an apartment at SJR Luxuria with SJR Enterprises situated in Arakere, Bangalore. As on April 26, 2011, the petitioner had paid Rs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-in-bangalore-is-fined-for-delay-in-construction-20929/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder fined of Rs 11.31 lakh by the consumer forum</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-of-rs-11-31-lakh-by-the-consumer-forum-20621</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-of-rs-11-31-lakh-by-the-consumer-forum-20621#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G T Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate in Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonepat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDI Infrastructure Pvt Ltd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=20621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The consumer forum has ordered TDI Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, a real estate firm to refund Rs 11.31 lakh to a customer for its failure to give him the possession of a shop in the desired time limit. Moreover, the booking amount was collected without having an agreement and  it is considered as unfair trade practice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-of-rs-11-31-lakh-by-the-consumer-forum-20621/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Booking amount to be refunded by Triveni Infrastructure</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/booking-amount-to-be-refunded-by-triveni-infrastructure-20416</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/booking-amount-to-be-refunded-by-triveni-infrastructure-20416#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booking refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer forum in Faridabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project at Faridabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate in faridabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[township project at Faridabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triveni Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=20416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A consumer forum in Faridabad has ordered the Real estate developer Triveni Infrastructure to refund Rs 6 lakh to one of its customers. The customer had booked a flat in a township project at Faridabad. even after four years of the booking, the customer is still waiting for the possession. The forum has found the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/booking-amount-to-be-refunded-by-triveni-infrastructure-20416/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customers claim supported by consumer forum</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/customers-claim-supported-by-consumer-forum-17638</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/customers-claim-supported-by-consumer-forum-17638#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartments in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booking amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flats in Greater noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flats in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of the flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitech builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitech developer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=17638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum asked the Unitech developer to pay Rs 6.6 lakh to a home buyer who booked a flat. The customer wanted to cancel the booking after several hike in the rate of the flat. Earlier the customer booked the flat in Greater Noida at a rate of Rs 3200 per [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/customers-claim-supported-by-consumer-forum-17638/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False promise made builder pay</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/false-promise-made-builder-pay-10844</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/false-promise-made-builder-pay-10844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahadevapura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumadhura Constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sumadhura Shangrilla Apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water connection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=10844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is no strange news when we hear a builder promising something and not providing it afterwards! To teach a lesson to these type of builders, residents of Bangalore took ahead a step and made them pay. Builders Sumadhura Constructions, whose Sumadhura Shangrilla Apartments at Mahadevapura had 84 owners, paid 100% amount on water connection. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/false-promise-made-builder-pay-10844/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not pay for parking</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic amenities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay extra for parking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=10422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news to all the flat buyers in Mumbai! You need not pay extra for parking. Same orders were passed on by the consumer court. According to the rules, parking is to be provided as one of the basic amenities. Under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA) this rule was considered. &#160; Source: The Times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court orders Builder to refund Cost of Plot</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-builder-to-refund-cost-of-plot-5185</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-builder-to-refund-cost-of-plot-5185#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court orders builder to refund cost of plot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida UP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitishree Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shauryapuram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP land acquisition issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=5185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The district consumer forum orders Nitishree Infrastructure to refund the deposit with 15 per cent annual interest.The forum has also imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000 on the builder for mental harassment and legal costs. Charanjit Lal a native of Amritsar had booked a plot in the project named Shauryapuram launched by Nitishree Infrastructure in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-orders-builder-to-refund-cost-of-plot-5185/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government To Clamp Down One-sided Contracts</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/government-to-clamp-down-one-sided-contracts-4117</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/government-to-clamp-down-one-sided-contracts-4117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-sided Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protect the weaker party against the stronger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection against unfair contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service providers or manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unilateral contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=4117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the present laws, the contracts are unilateral and there is no protection against unfair contracts. Often, service providers want consumers to sign on the dotted line even if the terms and conditions are stiff and give little leeway to consumers. The government is set to revamp the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to provide for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/government-to-clamp-down-one-sided-contracts-4117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai District Consumer Forum ordered Builder To Pay Compensation of Rs 10 lakh</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-district-consumer-forum-ordered-builder-to-pay-compensation-of-rs-10-lakh-3962</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-district-consumer-forum-ordered-builder-to-pay-compensation-of-rs-10-lakh-3962#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 06:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder to pay compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra State Consumer Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai consumer court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai District Consumer Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Properties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=3962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Builder to pay compensation of Rs 5 lakh each to two buyers for failing to hand over flats booked by them. Mumbai district consumer forum held that failure on part of the builder, Sharma Realty Pvt. Ltd., to execute the Agreement for Sale was deficiency in service and ordered to pay compensation to two buyers. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-district-consumer-forum-ordered-builder-to-pay-compensation-of-rs-10-lakh-3962/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RWA cannot be blamed for security lapses</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laxity of a security guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resident of DDA Flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents welfare associations cannot be blamed for security lapses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents Welfare Associations Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RWA cannot be blamed for security lapses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Delhi district forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=2808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents welfare associations cannot be blamed for security lapses because of carelessness of security guards in a colony The South Delhi district forum said that if a resident receives injury due to the laxity of a security guard then it does not amount to &#8220;deficiency in service&#8221; on the part of the association which receives [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rwa-cannot-be-blamed-for-security-lapses-2808/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer court order has cheered scores of home-buyers</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/consumer-court-order-has-cheered-scores-of-home-buyers-2432</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/consumer-court-order-has-cheered-scores-of-home-buyers-2432#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder fined for not giving amenities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer court order cheered scores of home-buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai consumer court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=2432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai fined Builder Rs 6.5 Lakh  for not giving amenities. The consumer court order has cheered scores of home-buyers who are misled or even duped by builders. In 1997, a retired IOC executive and his son booked a flat in Goregaon (east) in a project advertised as &#8220;exclusive homes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/consumer-court-order-has-cheered-scores-of-home-buyers-2432/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder fined 20 Lakh for a delay in giving possession</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-for-a-delay-in-giving-possession-78</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-for-a-delay-in-giving-possession-78#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder fined for a delay in giving possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay in giving possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra State Consumer Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rs 2000 a day for a delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maharashtra State Consumer Commission recently directed a developer to shell out Rs 20 lakh at the rate of Rs 2,000 a day for a delay in giving possession of a shop premises to a purchaser. The purchaser Dharshi Dedhia was a tenant who a possessed a shop &#38; godown in Rajhans building in Thane [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-fined-for-a-delay-in-giving-possession-78/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
