<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; Flat buyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/flat-buyers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is conveyance deed a failure?</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/is-conveyance-deed-a-failure-34522</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/is-conveyance-deed-a-failure-34522#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 06:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Priyanka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conveyance deed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat buyers in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Societies in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prithviraj Chavan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=34522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, conveyance deed was first introduced in the real estate market to protect the interest of home buyers. But this year, hardly 1,200 housing societies have applied for conveyance certificate out of 88,000 and only 700 of them got the deed. The Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan in a recent meeting said that a statewide drive will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/is-conveyance-deed-a-failure-34522/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maharashtra CM not in favour of extending VAT deadline</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/maharashtra-cm-not-in-favour-of-extending-vat-deadline-31630</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/maharashtra-cm-not-in-favour-of-extending-vat-deadline-31630#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maharashtra vat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prithviraj Chavan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value added tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT payment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=31630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sources reveal that Maharashtra chief minister Prithviraj Chavan is not in favour of extending the deadline for paying value added tax (VAT) or reducing the tax rate on flat purchases. As the order of paying VAT has been handled by the high court, the chief minister does not want to extend the deadline or reduce [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/maharashtra-cm-not-in-favour-of-extending-vat-deadline-31630/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CREDAI calls for one per cent VAT norm</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/credai-calls-for-one-per-cent-vat-norm-31514</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/credai-calls-for-one-per-cent-vat-norm-31514#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Association of India (CREDAI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREDAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT payment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=31514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India (CREDAI) has called for the one per cent norm related to VAT payment to be adopted for the retrospective period between 2006 and 2010. The issue is pending with the Supreme Court, which had issued an interim order asking that the VAT on properties sold between the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/credai-calls-for-one-per-cent-vat-norm-31514/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No need for NOC from developers: Maharashtra govt</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-need-for-noc-from-developers-maharashtra-govt-30061</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-need-for-noc-from-developers-maharashtra-govt-30061#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maharshtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Objection Certificate (NOC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-objection certificate(NOC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale or transfer of flats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=30061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maharashtra Housing Department has offered a major relief to flat buyers and society residents. The state government has said that there is no need for a no-objection certificate (NOC) from the developer for sale or transfer of flat (resale) in a fully constructed building. The clarification has come after allegations of developers illegally collecting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-need-for-noc-from-developers-maharashtra-govt-30061/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refund of additional VAT promised by Maharashtra sales tax department</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/refund-of-additional-vat-promised-by-maharashtra-sales-tax-department-28612</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/refund-of-additional-vat-promised-by-maharashtra-sales-tax-department-28612#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry (MCHI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state sales tax department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The sales tax department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value added tax (VAT)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=28612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state sales tax department of Maharashtra has insisted that the payable value added tax (VAT) is much less than three per cent. This has put buyers who purchased flats between 2006 and 2010 and had paid money, in a fix as to how to recover the additional amount paid. Till now, there has been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/refund-of-additional-vat-promised-by-maharashtra-sales-tax-department-28612/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Housing Regulatory Bill criticized</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-regulatory-bill-criticized-27520</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-regulatory-bill-criticized-27520#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing regulatory authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing regulatory bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Housing Regulatory Development authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=27520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The experts have criticized the new housing regulatory bill in Maharashtra. Under the new housing regulatory bill, not only the developer but even flat buyers can be put behind bars and made to pay a fine if they fail to comply with the housing regulatory authority’s order. Experts feel there is nothing to cheer about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-regulatory-bill-criticized-27520/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New housing bill criticized in Maharashtra</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-bill-criticized-in-maharashtra-27307</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-bill-criticized-in-maharashtra-27307#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Housing (Regulation & Development) Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=27307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Maharashtra Housing (Regulation &#38; Development) Bill, 2012, came under attack from housing experts as they labeled it ‘builder friendly’. Activists, housing societies and flat buyers claimed that not only was it poorly drafted, but also failed to maintain transparency and stated that it is a watered down version of the repealed Maharashtra Ownership [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-housing-bill-criticized-in-maharashtra-27307/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builders must abide by OC conditions &#8211; Forum</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-must-abide-by-oc-conditions-forum-24946</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-must-abide-by-oc-conditions-forum-24946#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District consumer forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leakages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupation certificate (OC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radhakrishna Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainwater Harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarvottam Co-operative Housing Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar water heater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=24946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thane District Consumer Forum has ruled that builders must stand by the conditions laid down by civic authority while granting the occupation certificate (OC), even though if such conditions are not a part of the sale agreement with flat buyers. Recently, a complaint was filed by Sarvottam Co-operative Housing Society against city-based Radhakrishna Developers. According [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-must-abide-by-oc-conditions-forum-24946/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>350 luxury flats by DLF</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/350-luxury-flats-by-dlf-14540</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/350-luxury-flats-by-dlf-14540#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st February 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Educational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers in Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Primus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Primus in Gurgaon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=14540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DLF have sold 350 luxury flats in their luxurious housing projects “The Primus” in Gurgaon. The project is in high priority among the flat buyers in Delhi. DLF launched the project on 21st February, 2012 and almost all the flats were sold on the same day wherein DLF achieved a booking of Rs 500 crores [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/350-luxury-flats-by-dlf-14540/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CWG flats in Delhi held up with issues!</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cwg-flats-in-delhi-held-up-with-issues-14537</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cwg-flats-in-delhi-held-up-with-issues-14537#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment premises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Completion certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CWG flat owners.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDA Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi Development Authority (DDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes between the developers and DDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Four towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unsold flats in CWG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=14537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Delhi High Court on Thursday ordered Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to issue the completion certificate to CWG flat owners. This will definitely bring a breath of happiness to all the 400 flat owners. DDA assured the court that they had already started the process for four towers in the apartment premises. DDA also informed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cwg-flats-in-delhi-held-up-with-issues-14537/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noida flat owners association to move court against builder</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/noida-flat-owners-association-to-move-court-against-builder-12099</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/noida-flat-owners-association-to-move-court-against-builder-12099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land acquisition cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land acquisition cases of Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEFOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida flat owners association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Olympia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pending payments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=12099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Noida Extension was lots in news for past few months, another one has added itself to the list! Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association (NEFOMA) have decided to take legal action against a builder who asked the buyers for interest for pending payments. Builder of Palm Olympia is asking for extra interest on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/noida-flat-owners-association-to-move-court-against-builder-12099/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greater Noida Master Plan 2021 delayed!</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/greater-noida-master-plan-2021-delayed-11195</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/greater-noida-master-plan-2021-delayed-11195#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluctuating property rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida Master Plan 2021]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCR Planning Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Buyers' Welfare Association (NEFBWA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Possession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=11195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The construction projects in Noida extension is kept pending due to delay in Greater Noida Master Plan 2021. The home buyers and developers are worried about the fluctuating property rates. Therefore the Noida extension home buyers have written to NCR Planning Board to complete 2021 project at the earliest. Noida Extension Flat Buyers&#8217; Welfare Association [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/greater-noida-master-plan-2021-delayed-11195/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not pay for parking</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic amenities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay extra for parking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=10422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news to all the flat buyers in Mumbai! You need not pay extra for parking. Same orders were passed on by the consumer court. According to the rules, parking is to be provided as one of the basic amenities. Under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA) this rule was considered. &#160; Source: The Times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/do-not-pay-for-parking-10422/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>25 percent hike in flat rates</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/25-percent-hike-in-flat-rates-10153</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/25-percent-hike-in-flat-rates-10153#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREDAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land allottees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purposeful hike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=10153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New flat buyers be ready to shell out more and more money in Noida. This is not a purposeful hike the developers have opted for! Developers in Noida city had to make around Rs 3,000 crore payment for the notices that the Uttar Pradesh government had issued to land allottees. Failing badly to pay this amount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/25-percent-hike-in-flat-rates-10153/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Layout Changes to be Approved by Flat Buyers</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/layout-changes-to-be-approved-by-flat-buyers-7229</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/layout-changes-to-be-approved-by-flat-buyers-7229#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change in layout plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consent from allottees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing societies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing societies in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layout Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layout of a housing plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layout of a housing plan in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layout plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Objection Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh Apartment Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare amenities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noida Authority has come to a mandatory conclusion for the builders and the developers to get consent from allottees if the builders want to make changes in their layout plan. Regular complaints concerned unwarranted changes are carried out by the developers in the layout of a housing plan. The Noida Authority has come forward to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/layout-changes-to-be-approved-by-flat-buyers-7229/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Buildings identified in Chennai</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/illegal-buildings-identified-in-chennai-7155</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/illegal-buildings-identified-in-chennai-7155#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buildings with violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choolai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choolai Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers in Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal buildings in Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kilpauk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking allotments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pursawalkkam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu town planning Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 500 buildings with violations have been identified in Chennai and notices are served under Tamil Nadu town planning Act. Several innocent people who are ignorant of building norms and town planning rules end up buying such buildings. Flat buyers in the city should check the building norms and parking allotments, as the possibility [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/illegal-buildings-identified-in-chennai-7155/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increase in Repo Rate affected the Property Markets in Pune</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/increase-in-repo-rate-affected-the-property-markets-in-pune-6398</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/increase-in-repo-rate-affected-the-property-markets-in-pune-6398#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable housing schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increase in Repo Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest on home loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate is the second largest employment generating sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repo Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repo Rate affected the Property Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Bank of India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=6398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real estate is the second largest employment generating sector, which will be hit by the decision to increase repo rate by the Reserve Bank of India for the third time since May this year. Out of total price of a flat, some 36% amount goes as tax to the government. Since March 2010, the RBI [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/increase-in-repo-rate-affected-the-property-markets-in-pune-6398/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder to pay Rs 1 lakh for not giving Flats to Buyers</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-for-not-giving-flats-to-buyers-5945</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-for-not-giving-flats-to-buyers-5945#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder to pay Rs 1 lakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Legal Aid Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mira Road Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai-based RNA Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rs 1 lakh for not giving Flats to Buyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=5945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mumbai-based RNA Builders (NG) have to pay Rs 1 lakh fine for the failure in handing over the flats to their buyers. The forum National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission then ordered the builder to return the money along with compensation.The complainants, however, were aggrieved at this ruling as they did not want the money, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-to-pay-rs-1-lakh-for-not-giving-flats-to-buyers-5945/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
