<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; HC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/hc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Building byelaw breach HC requires details of the cases</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/building-byelaw-breach-hc-requires-details-of-the-cases-59300</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/building-byelaw-breach-hc-requires-details-of-the-cases-59300#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B V Nagarathna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D H Waghela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malleswaram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malleswaram Residents' Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation of building byelaws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=59300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HC of Karnataka guided the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike to file a report on the steps taken to clear the huge backlog. While the hearing of petition by Malleswaram Residents’ Welfare Association on rampant violation of building byelaws in the City, a bench of D H Waghela and Justice B V Nagarathna directed the Palike to take proper steps [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/building-byelaw-breach-hc-requires-details-of-the-cases-59300/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court order on Land Act defines guidelines for implementation</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-order-on-land-act-defines-guidelines-for-implementation-59294</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-order-on-land-act-defines-guidelines-for-implementation-59294#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haryana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jairam Ramesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Acquisition Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural development minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=59294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Jairam Ramesh, Rural Development Minister, says that the Supreme Court judgment upholding the retrospective clause of the new Land Acquisition Act has defines rules for the implementation of a significant clause in the law. He further says that the recent judgment was since last 5 years. He also added that the award was passed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/court-order-on-land-act-defines-guidelines-for-implementation-59294/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMR turns to HC on UDF charges</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airports Economic Regulatory Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP High Court.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengaluru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHIAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR turns to HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMR turns to High court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naveen Rao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[udf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=58504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GMR has moved the AP High Court challenging the decision of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) in discontinuing collection of user Development Fee for the next two years. The GHIAL has concluded that the AERA has no jurisdiction to fix the UDF and it was the Central government of India who has power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/gmr-turns-to-hc-on-udf-charges-58504/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC orders to name the owners of multiple plots</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-to-name-the-owners-of-multiple-plots-57412</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-to-name-the-owners-of-multiple-plots-57412#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 04:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 people have multiple plots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegedly granted multiple plots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhajan Lal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daya Chaudhary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dura Ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faridabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR for the charges of owning more than one plot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haryana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haryana High Court orders to name the owners of multiple plots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hisar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janpath Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panchkula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shankar Dyal Sharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Development Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=57412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Punjab and Haryana High Court had asked the urban development authority to give the name of people that were allegedly granted multiple plots. As per the HUDA record, almost 8,000 people have multiple plots under the various categories. Justice Daya Chaudhary also advised HUDA authorities to declare the names of people who had taken [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-to-name-the-owners-of-multiple-plots-57412/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuffe Parade flat gets 30cr in public auction</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cuffe-parade-flat-gets-30cr-in-public-auction-56162</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cuffe-parade-flat-gets-30cr-in-public-auction-56162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 05:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arabian Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arif Fazlani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuffe Parade flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm’s website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gujarat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Shahrukh Kathawalla.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathawalla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maker Towers B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Drive and the Arabian Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seafacing Cuffe Parade flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sopariwala Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=56162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 3,000 sq ft apartment in Maker Towers B was put up for auction following insolvency proceedings against a city businessman who owned the flat that sold for Rs 1.01 lakh per sq ft. The prominent businessman outbid others at a public auction in the Bombay high court on Tuesday with his offer of Rs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cuffe-parade-flat-gets-30cr-in-public-auction-56162/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co-op societies striclty asked not to sale land without permission by HC</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/co-op-societies-striclty-asked-not-to-sale-land-without-permission-by-hc-35785</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/co-op-societies-striclty-asked-not-to-sale-land-without-permission-by-hc-35785#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mainaki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal property sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sachchidananda Nagar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trend in Real estate India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=35785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR :  The new rule from the Delhi high court have restricted transfer and sale of plots by owners from housing societies. Soami Nagar cooperative house building society has recently been penalized by Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Vipin Sanghi for the  sale of a plot by its member to an outsider. The society has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/co-op-societies-striclty-asked-not-to-sale-land-without-permission-by-hc-35785/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC’s instructions influence PMC</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/karnataka-hcs-instructions-influence-pmc-34768</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/karnataka-hcs-instructions-influence-pmc-34768#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elected representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWaCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste segregation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=34768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pune- The orders issued by Karnataka high court regarding waste segregation and management has inspired the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to get rid of garbage mismanagement in Pune. The court, stressing on waste segregation at source in Bangalore, ordered that residents have to segregate dry and wet waste at household level and then the segregated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/karnataka-hcs-instructions-influence-pmc-34768/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court directs to dump dry, wet waste separately</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-directs-to-dump-dry-wet-waste-separately-33666</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-directs-to-dump-dry-wet-waste-separately-33666#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chikkanagamangala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dry waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Impact Assessment Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarjapura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste processing units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wet waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=33666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bangalore- A new temporary landfill for dumping wet waste has been identified and approved by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB). Being located in Chikkanagamangala village of Sarjapura hobli in the outskirts of Bangalore, the new landfill covers an area of around 94 acres, which will be the destination to dump 2,500-3,000 tonnes of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-directs-to-dump-dry-wet-waste-separately-33666/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC asked to remove trespasses on Tiruvannamalai hill</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asked-to-remove-trespasses-on-tiruvannamalai-hill-19169</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asked-to-remove-trespasses-on-tiruvannamalai-hill-19169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land grabbing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiruvannamalai hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=19169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Madras High Court has directed the State government to take immediate action to remove trespasses on the Tiruvannamalai hill. The order was given for a petition filed against the  illegal encroachments and land grabbing activity on the hill. Several lodges were constructed on the hill in the name of the temple. And to construct [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asked-to-remove-trespasses-on-tiruvannamalai-hill-19169/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiranandani asked to submit plans for affordable houses</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-asked-to-submit-plans-for-affordable-houses-18832</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-asked-to-submit-plans-for-affordable-houses-18832#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable houses in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiranandanis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lavish constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxurious apartments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niranjan Hiranandani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powai township project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=18832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HC directed the Hiranandanis to construct 3,100 affordable houses. According to the order, the developer have to take permission to embark on further construction after he finalized the constructions of the affordable houses. Niranjan Hiranandani will submit plans for construction of affordable houses in his Powai township project within two weeks. The HC stopped [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hiranandani-asked-to-submit-plans-for-affordable-houses-18832/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safeguard heritage structure from metro constructions</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safeguard-heritage-structure-from-metro-constructions-9807</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safeguard-heritage-structure-from-metro-constructions-9807#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai metro rail corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law college campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madras High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madrasa-I-Azam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poonamallee High Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public interest litigation (PIL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripon Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Andrews Kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Public Hall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madras High Court has directed Chennai metro rail corporation to carry on metro work without damaging the structural stability of heritage structures in the city. Directions were passed by HC only after Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by a travel agent to safety the heritage buildings in the city. Heritage buildings such as; Ripon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/safeguard-heritage-structure-from-metro-constructions-9807/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rs. 1000 fine for illegal parking</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rs-1000-fine-for-illegal-parking-9804</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rs-1000-fine-for-illegal-parking-9804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Champapet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City traffic police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMRL Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court (HC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad City police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levy penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maruthi-nagar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prasannanjaneya Swamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shiridi Sai Temple extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopping areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin cities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illegal parking in Hyderabad will be followed up by enhanced penalty. High Court (HC) has ordered Hyderabad City police to levy penalty on vehicles trapped for parking illegally. HC implemented this norm after seeking complaints from the residents of areas like; DMRL Crossroads, Maruthi-nagar, Champapet, Prasannanjaneya Swamy and Shiridi Sai Temple extensions. To eradicate the concept [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/rs-1000-fine-for-illegal-parking-9804/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commonwealth Games Village flats under de-sealing drive</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/commonwealth-games-village-flats-under-de-sealing-drive-9790</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/commonwealth-games-village-flats-under-de-sealing-drive-9790#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Games Village (CGV)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De-sealing drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi Development Authority (DDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demolition of flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat allottees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floor Area Ratio (FAR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court (HC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD Appellate Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of urban development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unauthorized flats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) Appellate Tribunal has passed orders to de-seal the flats at Commonwealth Games Village (CGV) in New Delhi. Around 65 flats were sealed after the High Court (HC) orders were passed, 12 flats have already been de-sealed at CGV. Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had sealed these flats at CGV for having excessive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/commonwealth-games-village-flats-under-de-sealing-drive-9790/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC freezes tenders for pay and park scheme</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bench of Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Educated unemployed youth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local councillors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahila Bachat Gut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-and-Park Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payment norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserved categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tender policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) was busy alloting tenders for pay and park lots across the Mumbai city. Bombay high court (HC) meanwhile has freezed the process of tender upheld by BMC following a petition which is alleging the discrimination in payment norms. The new tender policy assigned 50% reservation for Mahila Bachat Gut, 25% for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sigh of relief to property buyers in Noida</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/a-sigh-of-relief-to-property-buyers-in-noida-9533</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/a-sigh-of-relief-to-property-buyers-in-noida-9533#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India (CREDAI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREDAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floor area plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green building norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEFOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension Flat Owners and Members Association (NEFOMA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Buyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Confederation of Real Estate Developers&#8217; Associations of India (CREDAI) have flavored in a sense of relief to the property buyers in Noida extension. CREDAI has decided to pause the interest on pending EMI payments to the property buyers who have already made 10 percent booking payments. High Court (HC) orders forced the developers to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/a-sigh-of-relief-to-property-buyers-in-noida-9533/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC orders no Prevalence on Land Acquisition</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-no-prevalence-on-land-acquisition-7373</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-no-prevalence-on-land-acquisition-7373#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orissa high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posco steel project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union ministry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court (HC) has passed a judgment stating that there should be no prevalence of Land Acquisition. The Orissa high court on Friday declined to grant an interim stay on acquisition of forest land by state government for the Posco steel project in Jagatsinghpur district. The Chief Justice V Gopala Gowda and Justice B [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-no-prevalence-on-land-acquisition-7373/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buyers have to pay EMIs also after the initial investment in the Noida Land</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-have-to-pay-emis-also-after-the-initial-investment-in-the-noida-land-5873</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-have-to-pay-emis-also-after-the-initial-investment-in-the-noida-land-5873#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allahabad high court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buyers have to pay EMIs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homebuyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homebuyers are on tenterhook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Initial investment in the Noida Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land acquisition in Sahberi village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patwari denotification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paying installments on post-dated cheques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sahberi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court upheld an Allahabad high court order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=5873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Supreme Court upheld an Allahabad high court order cancelling the land acquisition in Sahberi village, the builders had offered to relocate the initial 6000 homebuyers out of 26000. But still buyers have little prospect of relocating to another apartment in the same area and on top of that they will also have to keep [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/buyers-have-to-pay-emis-also-after-the-initial-investment-in-the-noida-land-5873/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
