<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; Legal notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/legal-notice/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AIG realty arm serves legal notice on RMZ Corp</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aig-realty-arm-serves-legal-notice-on-rmz-corp-30018</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aig-realty-arm-serves-legal-notice-on-rmz-corp-30018#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG Global Real Estate India Advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mall-cum residential property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millenia Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMZ Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special purpose vehicle (SPV)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=30018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indian arm of AIG&#8216;s global real-estate business has served a legal notice on Bangalore-based developer RMZ Corp. The notice came due to failure to let AIG exit its investment in a stalled joint venture in Hyderabad. AIG Global Real Estate India Advisors had invested Rs 350-crore in the mall project, which got delayed due to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/aig-realty-arm-serves-legal-notice-on-rmz-corp-30018/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder faces wrath for late possession</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-faces-wrath-for-late-possession-12814</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-faces-wrath-for-late-possession-12814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice to builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential communities in Sohna Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior town planner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town and country planning department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town and Country Planning department of Haryana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatika City Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatika City on Sohna Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatika City residents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=12814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to late hand over of apartments, Vatika City residents have sent a legal notice to the builder. The project being one of the luxurious residential communities in Sohna Road houses around 1000 families and had place for another 450. However, builder had failed to keep the promise of delivering the units and facilities on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builder-faces-wrath-for-late-possession-12814/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belligerent action taken over Property Tax collection by Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/belligerent-action-taken-over-property-tax-collection-by-bruhat-bengaluru-mahanagara-palike-8278</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/belligerent-action-taken-over-property-tax-collection-by-bruhat-bengaluru-mahanagara-palike-8278#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overdue tax payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self declared property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax collection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=8278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An aggressive act has been upheld by Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) in Bangalore with the pending payment of property tax yet to cleared by the builders and house owners. Henceforth the BBMP Commissioner Mr Siddiah had conferenced a meeting in presence with all the BBMP officials recently to trace down the percentage of pending [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/belligerent-action-taken-over-property-tax-collection-by-bruhat-bengaluru-mahanagara-palike-8278/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai Builder Fake Promises to Flat Owners in Wadala Highrise</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-builder-fake-promises-to-flat-owners-in-wadala-highrise-8171</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-builder-fake-promises-to-flat-owners-in-wadala-highrise-8171#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wadala Highrise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=8171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The builder of Mumbai city had promised to provide best amenities to the flat owners in a Wadala Highrise and has never seem to be aiming up to fulfill the promises henceforth the builder is now asked to pay Rs 6.07 lakh. The Central Mumbai District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum has ordered Green Developers and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/mumbai-builder-fake-promises-to-flat-owners-in-wadala-highrise-8171/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DCR Violation against a Builder.</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dcr-violation-against-a-builder-7320</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dcr-violation-against-a-builder-7320#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development Control Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space index issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gulmohur Residents Association]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gulmohur Residents Association, in its legal notice to the company, said that the building was constructed in violation of various Development Control Regulations (DCR) and has asked it to desist from selling it to a third party till the floor space index issue is resolved. Vibhav Krishna, advocate for the association, reported saying, &#8220;the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dcr-violation-against-a-builder-7320/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builders to Pay for Leak in a Flat in Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-to-pay-for-leak-in-a-flat-in-mumbai-7055</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-to-pay-for-leak-in-a-flat-in-mumbai-7055#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builders to Pay for Leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cordcon Builders Pvt Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dampness in flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faulty construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leak in a Flat in Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leakage during the monsoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repairing the damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Written complaints to the builder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cordcon Builders Pvt Ltd will have to pay the amount to one of its residents, Anant Shirotiya as reimbursement for the money he spent on repairing the damage and the mental agony he suffered due to the leakage. In March 2002, Shirotiya booked a flat in Cordcon&#8217;s high rise, Sagar City. Shirotiya noticed dampness in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/builders-to-pay-for-leak-in-a-flat-in-mumbai-7055/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pune Builder to pay Rs 45 Lakh to Flat Buyer for a Flat worth Rs 6.5 Lakh</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-builder-to-pay-rs-45-lakh-to-flat-buyer-for-a-flat-worth-rs-6-5-lakh-6888</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-builder-to-pay-rs-45-lakh-to-flat-buyer-for-a-flat-worth-rs-6-5-lakh-6888#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 06:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Builder with a malafide intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat to a third party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat worth Rs 6.5 Lakh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kothrud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kothrud Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune Builder to pay Rs 45 Lakh to Flat Buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune-based builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third party interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=6888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent, a best case has been seen how the builders/developers exploit the consumers. In February 2001, Prashant Kulkarni booked a flat measuring around 975 sq ft for Rs 6.5 lakh in a building which was to be constructed by the builder Vijay Wagh at Kothrud. The possession was to be handed over on or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/pune-builder-to-pay-rs-45-lakh-to-flat-buyer-for-a-flat-worth-rs-6-5-lakh-6888/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
