<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories &#187; petition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groups.commonfloor.com/news/tag/petition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news</link>
	<description>Property News India and Featured Real Estate Stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 17:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review petition filed by Maharashtra government against Supreme Court’s forestland order</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/review-petition-filed-by-maharashtra-government-against-supreme-courts-forestland-order-64289</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/review-petition-filed-by-maharashtra-government-against-supreme-courts-forestland-order-64289#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swiftsales.cf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition filed against Supreme Court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition filed by Maharashtra government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petitions against Land Acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petitions filed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court order on private forest land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court order to free private forest land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme court orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court’s forestland order]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=64289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A review petition has been filed by the Maharashtra government against a Supreme Court order which allows over 3 lakh people to live on the property which they have purchased on land that is deemed private forest. The review petition was filed in April. The filing of the review petition by the Maharashtra government can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/review-petition-filed-by-maharashtra-government-against-supreme-courts-forestland-order-64289/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allahabad High Court ordered demolition of Supertech’s towers</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/allahabad-high-court-ordered-demolition-of-supertechs-towers-60346</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/allahabad-high-court-ordered-demolition-of-supertechs-towers-60346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40 storey towers in Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allahabad court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerald Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Building Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noida Building Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector 93a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Leave Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supertech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twin towers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=60346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The home buyers in realty developer Supertech&#8217;s two under-construction 40-storey towers in Noida held demonstrations on Sunday. They were protesting against the builder and the Allahabad High Court ruling that ordered demolition of the apartment blocks. About 250 home buyers gathered at the construction site in Noida&#8217;s Sector 93A. Anil Kumar, who bought a 1,050 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/allahabad-high-court-ordered-demolition-of-supertechs-towers-60346/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC asks HDIL to hand over possession of Kurla&#8217;s Premier Residency flats</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-asks-hdil-to-hand-over-possession-of-kurlas-premier-residency-flats-60337</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-asks-hdil-to-hand-over-possession-of-kurlas-premier-residency-flats-60337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing development and infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=60337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Housing Development &#38; Infrastructure Ltd has been asked by the High Court to consider handing over possession of ready flats at its Premier Residency project at Kurla in Mumbai. The Bombay high Court suggested that the lawyers representing the developer and home buyers should try for an out of-court settlement. Aejaz Saiyed, who has bought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-asks-hdil-to-hand-over-possession-of-kurlas-premier-residency-flats-60337/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLB puts a stop on Aruna Hotels’ Chennai property development</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/clb-puts-a-stop-on-aruna-hotels-chennai-property-development-60334</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/clb-puts-a-stop-on-aruna-hotels-chennai-property-development-60334#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 06:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gaurav.gupta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aruna hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aruna Hotels Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab National Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respondents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subasri Realty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=60334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CLB advised the respondents, in an interim order on April 9, to refrain from selling or creating any third party interest in the property. The respondents include M Shivaram, Chairman and Managing Director of Aruna Hotels; Kartick Shivaram, Executive Director; and the Directors S Kalyanam, CL Ravichandran, and Kamal Babbar. The 1.2 acre property [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/clb-puts-a-stop-on-aruna-hotels-chennai-property-development-60334/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No construction activities between 10 pm to 6 am: High Court</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-construction-activities-between-10-pm-to-6-am-high-court-35099</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-construction-activities-between-10-pm-to-6-am-high-court-35099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[builders in bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concreting work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India’s (CREDAI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction equipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREDAI members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Division Bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finishing work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.P nagar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public interest litigation (PIL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarakki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sobha Dew Flowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=35099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bangalore- The Karnataka High Court, has banned all construction related activities from 10 pm to 6 am in the city. Relaxing its order passed on 6th December, in which the court had directed builders to totally ban all construction or allied activities from 6 pm to 8 am, it has permitted the builders to carry [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/no-construction-activities-between-10-pm-to-6-am-high-court-35099/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court sends notices to BDA, BBMP</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-sends-notices-to-bda-bbmp-34592</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-sends-notices-to-bda-bbmp-34592#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 05:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affidavit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartment project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore Development Authority (BDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BEL Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLA Layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=34592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bangalore- The Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) have been sent notices from the Karnataka High Court, with regard to a petition filed by residents of MLA Layout on BEL Road, seeking road connectivity. Officials of BBMP and BDA, who had submitted a false affidavit were warned by the division [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/high-court-sends-notices-to-bda-bbmp-34592/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGCOM’s complaint against DLF gets rejected</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dgcoms-complaint-against-dlf-gets-rejected-34631</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dgcoms-complaint-against-dlf-gets-rejected-34631#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 05:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chennai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booking flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India (CCI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGCOM association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGCOM Buyers and Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Corridor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Express Corridor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Mahabalipuram Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prima facie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential project in Chennai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/news/?p=34631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A complaint filed by DGCOM Buyers and Owners Association against Delhi-based leading realtor DLF, alleging market power exploitation, has been declined by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The Chennai-based association had filed a petition with CCI claiming that DLF has misused its dominant market position relating to a residential project in Chennai. The petition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/dgcoms-complaint-against-dlf-gets-rejected-34631/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporation gives incorrect information to residents</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/corporation-gives-incorrect-information-to-residents-33904</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/corporation-gives-incorrect-information-to-residents-33904#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coimbatore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coimbatore Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graveyard road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streetlights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=33904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coimbatore- In a written response to a resident&#8217;s petition which was sent nearly a month ago, the Coimbatore Corporation’s North Zone stated that it has repaired the streetlights in graveyard road and they are glowing well. But in fact, the lights were not glowing for over a year, and many of them had no bulbs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/corporation-gives-incorrect-information-to-residents-33904/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New BBMP garbage tender challenged by old contractors</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-bbmp-garbage-tender-challenged-by-old-contractors-31906</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-bbmp-garbage-tender-challenged-by-old-contractors-31906#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbmp contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic Body Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garbage collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pourakarmikas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=31906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) seems not to get any respite from garbage issues. In a petition, the new approved garbage tender proposals floated by BBMP have been challenged by old contractors. The counselor for the petition says that the new proposals have many discrepancies. The new proposals require a pourakarmika to sweep at least [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/new-bbmp-garbage-tender-challenged-by-old-contractors-31906/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCI dismisses flat owner&#8217;s petition</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cci-dismisses-flat-owners-petition-31349</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cci-dismisses-flat-owners-petition-31349#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gurgaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aravali Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCI order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dharuhera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwarkadhis Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private builders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-estate developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rewari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=31349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has dismissed a flat owner&#8217;s petition alleging abuse of dominant position by private builder, Dwarkadhis Projects, in Gurgaon. The petitioner is a home owner at Aravali Heights at Sector-24, Dharuhera in Rewari. CCI rejected the petition on the account that the builder is not a dominant player in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/cci-dismisses-flat-owners-petition-31349/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC asks BBMP to evict staff from buildings</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asks-bbmp-to-evict-staff-from-buildings-29780</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asks-bbmp-to-evict-staff-from-buildings-29780#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP residential complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike(BBMP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JC Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kumbaragundi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=29780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has been asked by the High Court to maintain buildings allotted to its staff and ensure livable condition in them. The high court has directed the BBMP commissioner to temporarily evict the occupants of a BBMP residential complex at Kumbaragundi, JC Road, until it is fit for human habitation. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-asks-bbmp-to-evict-staff-from-buildings-29780/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telenor moves approaches Delhi High Court against Unitech</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/telenor-moves-approaches-delhi-high-court-against-unitech-28764</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/telenor-moves-approaches-delhi-high-court-against-unitech-28764#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi-NCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income-tax department (I-T)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indemnity claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Venture partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate in Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telenor Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitech Ltd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=28764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telenor Group has approached Delhi High Court seeking that its Joint Venture partner Unitech Ltd be asked to set aside Rs 6,400 crore, or be directed to provide guarantees for the amount through a deposit. The Norwegian company moved the court as it fears the real estate company may not be able to pay the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/telenor-moves-approaches-delhi-high-court-against-unitech-28764/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC rejects plea against property tax notice</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-rejects-plea-against-property-tax-notice-27257</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-rejects-plea-against-property-tax-notice-27257#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 07:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dipjyoti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune cantonment board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGS Infratech Ltd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=27257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bombay High Court has refused to entertain a petition filed by SGS Infratech Ltd challenging the propriety of notice issued by Chief Executive Officer of Pune Cantonment Board. The notice demanded property tax from April 1991 to March 2012 in respect of its property on the defence land.The bench stated that the petition is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-rejects-plea-against-property-tax-notice-27257/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC grants stay order against Benjamin case</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-grants-stay-order-against-benjamin-case-24551</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-grants-stay-order-against-benjamin-case-24551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poornima</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Corruption Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flats in Powai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury flats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMRDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niranjan Hiranandani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=24551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bombay High Court on Tuesday granted interim stay to senior bureaucrat T C Benjamin, on an order directing the Maharashtra Anti- Corruption Bureau (ACB) to investigate accusations against him in an alleged real estate scam. The ACB registered an FIR against Benjamin, the Principal Secretary of the State Urban Development Department, and developer Niranjan Hiranandani, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-grants-stay-order-against-benjamin-case-24551/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emaar MD seeks MBW recall citing health issues</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/emaar-md-seeks-mbw-recall-citing-health-issues-22821</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/emaar-md-seeks-mbw-recall-citing-health-issues-22821#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lekshmi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBI court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emaar case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emaar MGF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emaar Properties project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lookout notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-bailable arrest warrant petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serious health issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shravan Gupta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=22821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shravan Gupta, managing director (MD) of Emaar MGF, one of the India’s leading real estate developers, has moved a &#8216;recall&#8217; of the non-bailable arrest warrant petition in the CBI court as the court issued a lookout notice to him. The petition states that Gupta, one of the accused in the Emaar case, is unable to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/emaar-md-seeks-mbw-recall-citing-health-issues-22821/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residents of Boulder Hills withdraw petition</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-boulder-hills-withdraw-petition-17928</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-boulder-hills-withdraw-petition-17928#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apartment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP Industrial Infrastructure Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Hills Villa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Hills Villa Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Hills Villa Owners Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boulder Hills Villa Owners Association petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand-to-hand registration of properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Registration in Hyderabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Tax on Under construction property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=17928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The earlier filed petition in HC has been withdrawn back by the Boulder Hills Villa Owners Association recently. The petition was about an amendment in an order which directed the residents to deposit  Rs 15,000 per sq yard to AP Industrial Infrastructure Corp before submission of documents for registration. But the judge showed least interest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/residents-of-boulder-hills-withdraw-petition-17928/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBMP and BDA gets notice form High court</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bbmp-and-bda-gets-notice-form-high-court-12788</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bbmp-and-bda-gets-notice-form-high-court-12788#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore Development Authority (BDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore-Bellary National Highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBMP Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal construction of road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krishna Gangothri Layout’s Owners’ Welfare Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messers Crown Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Agricultural Sciences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=12788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The illegal construction of road between Bangalore-Bellary National Highway and University of Agricultural Sciences has right now become a major concern in Bangalore. A petition has been filed on Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) for the same by Krishna Gangothri Layout’s Owners’ Welfare Association. With the follow up of same petition, high court has issued notice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bbmp-and-bda-gets-notice-form-high-court-12788/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civic employees housing provision in High Court</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/civic-employees-housing-provision-in-high-court-11456</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/civic-employees-housing-provision-in-high-court-11456#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borla Village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chembur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Division bench of Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lease amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plot at Borla Village]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Possession of property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torna Cooperative Housing Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=11456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) ended up delaying taking up decisions on providing housing sectors for the civic employees in Mumbai. The Torna Cooperative Housing Society had allotted 4,000 sq m of plot at Borla Village, Chembur and respectively the employees had deposited lease amount. However, since then these civic employees have not got possession [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/civic-employees-housing-provision-in-high-court-11456/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC freezes tenders for pay and park scheme</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bench of Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Educated unemployed youth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local councillors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahila Bachat Gut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay-and-Park Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payment norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserved categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tender policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) was busy alloting tenders for pay and park lots across the Mumbai city. Bombay high court (HC) meanwhile has freezed the process of tender upheld by BMC following a petition which is alleging the discrimination in payment norms. The new tender policy assigned 50% reservation for Mahila Bachat Gut, 25% for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/bombay-hc-freezes-tenders-for-pay-and-park-scheme-9553/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perpetual Power Tariff Hike faced by residents of Bhubaneswar</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/perpetual-power-tariff-hike-faced-by-residents-of-bhubaneswar-9407</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/perpetual-power-tariff-hike-faced-by-residents-of-bhubaneswar-9407#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apex court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appellate Tribunal (AT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bhubaneswar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Increasing power tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orissa Electricity Regulation Commission (OERC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power distributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Bhubaneswar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tariff provision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voltage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=9407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Power tariff likely to increase&#8221; has become a common saying from the power distributors as there seems to be no end to the hike, the residents of Bhubaneswar are also turned numb with the rapidity increase in power tariffs. However it seems like even the Supreme Court has rejected a petition passed on by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/perpetual-power-tariff-hike-faced-by-residents-of-bhubaneswar-9407/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lakes in Bangalore are contaminated with harsh chemicals</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/lakes-in-bangalore-are-contaminated-with-harsh-chemicals-8478</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/lakes-in-bangalore-are-contaminated-with-harsh-chemicals-8478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellandur Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmful chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Institute of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents of Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Contamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=8478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bellandur lake in Bangalore is considered one of the beautiful lake midst the largest water bodies in the city. However it remains same no more as the lake is witnessing over flow of sewage water and harmful chemicals resulting in water contamination also causing threat to the lives of wildlife. The lake has a splendid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/lakes-in-bangalore-are-contaminated-with-harsh-chemicals-8478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punjab and Haryana Court Dismisses Petition against naming Mullanpur as New Chandigarh</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/punjab-and-haryana-court-dismisses-petition-against-naming-mullanpur-as-new-chandigarh-8262</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/punjab-and-haryana-court-dismisses-petition-against-naming-mullanpur-as-new-chandigarh-8262#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chandinagar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eco City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Mohali Area Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haryana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navi Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=8262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court of Punjab and Haryana has dismissed a petition to not to name Mullanpur as New Chandinagar. The bench in its observation said orally that there is no harm in the name citing and also there are similar cases in rest of a India like Mumbai named as Navi Mumbai. However the statement [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/punjab-and-haryana-court-dismisses-petition-against-naming-mullanpur-as-new-chandigarh-8262/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road Restoration Costs Rs 57crores in Varanasi</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/road-restoration-costs-rs-57crores-in-varanasi-8206</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/road-restoration-costs-rs-57crores-in-varanasi-8206#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonam Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calamity Relief Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy rainfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucknow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Varanasi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterlogged cities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=8206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The heavy rainfall at Varanasi lead to damaged roads in and around the city and the district administration has filed a petition for the allotment of Rs. 56.75 crores for restoration works. The budget will come under the Calamity Relief Fund (CRF) and will be forwarded to the relief commissioner in Lucknow. The petition was filed soon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/road-restoration-costs-rs-57crores-in-varanasi-8206/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC Orders Builders not to Violate Laws</title>
		<link>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-builders-not-to-violate-laws-7347</link>
		<comments>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-builders-not-to-violate-laws-7347#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rakesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affidavit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO Gulmohar Area Society Welfare Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shravan Developers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commonfloor.com/stories/?p=7347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High Court (HC) Mumbai on Tuesday reported a message to all the builders saying, “A message must go clearly to the builders that nobody should violate the law.” The High Court made the observation while hearing a petition filed by Shravan Developers Private Limited, that challenged the Municipal Commissioner’s order for recomputing the FSI and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://groups.commonfloor.com/news/hc-orders-builders-not-to-violate-laws-7347/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
