National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Abeyant construction, delayed possession, hollow promises and helpless buyers. These seem to have become a common trait in the real estate industry in the city. The case involving DLF portrays the helplessness of a buyer, who endured excruciating wait for getting a business space despite depositing over Rs 85 lakh and finally had his grievance [...] Continue Reading »
In a verdict which upholds the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)’s March 19 ruling, the Supreme Court has asked a Gurgaon-based realty developer – Ambience Pvt Ltd. – to refund Rs 33.38 crore maintenance fees charged from the residents of its project since 2002. The mentioned maintenance fees which Ambience has been asked to [...] Continue Reading »
The apex consumer commission has asked a real estate company to pay over Rs 1 crore to a doctor for its failure to give him possession of an apartment, saying that it was making profits at the expense of others. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) bench that was presided by Justice J M Malik, [...] Continue Reading »
There is some happy news for the property buyers as the unscrupulous developers will think twice before taking them for a ride. A bench of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NDCRC) gave a judgement in favour of the buyers. The apex consumer commission has dismissed an appeal filed by Emaar MGF Land Ltd against a [...] Continue Reading »
New Delhi: The apex consumer commission has directed prominent realty company Unitech Ltd to reimburse approximately Rs 14 lakh towards delay in possession. The customer – a Sanjay Goyal spent the same on rent due to the delay in possession date of the flat which he had bought. Over Rs 1.37 crore was paid by [...] Continue Reading »
Mumbai-based RNA Builders (NG) have to pay Rs 1 lakh fine for the failure in handing over the flats to their buyers. The forum National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission then ordered the builder to return the money along with compensation.The complainants, however, were aggrieved at this ruling as they did not want the money, but [...] Continue Reading »
